Skip to main content

Paranoia sets in....

I had a down day today. Not really surprising, I have been dealing with so much change lately and I am tired. It's unrealistic to think I would keep sailing through without some wobbles.

I picked up one of those UK magazines called Woman and Home at the supermarket today. Kind of like those weekly women’s mags in the States that promise huge weight loss in record time and then are full of recipes for chocolate cake and BBQ'd spare ribs.

Anyway, there was an article called “Beat Stress… even when your world is in a Whizz” which featured short snippets from popular self-help books. The comment from Eckhart Tolle, who wrote “The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment” got me thinking:

“Problems are mind made. Ultimately, it’s about realising there are no problems. Only situations—to be dealt with now, or left alone and accepted as part of the present moment until they change or CAN be dealt with. Ask yourself what “problem” you have right now, not next year, tomorrow, or five minutes from now. You might be carrying in your mind the insane burden of 100 things you will or may have to do in the future, instead of focusing your attention on the one thing you can do now. Make the decision to create no more problems, no more pain.”

I have no situation that NEEDS to be dealt with at present. The dog’s been fed, I can’t continue transcribing the rest of my Irish cemetery until my iPad recharges, and cooking dinner is half an hour away. So I can just sit and “be”—aaghhhh! My mind can’t deal with that. Instead it digs up my concern over how my landlady MIGHT be feeling about our leaving earlier than the three months we had originally said we would be here. And then the internal argument begins—

Val #1: This place is a dump. The house we’ve just rented in Dunmore East is way better, cheaper, everything works and there actually IS a village you can walk to that has grocery stores and people.
Val #2: Well she intimated that it might not be up to your American standard, that it was a 200 year old cottage. But I do agree she was obscure about the fact that the “village” that is nearby is just a collection of houses.
Val #1: Yeah well she only intimated about the house after she had me hooked with the description of the beautiful setting and pictures of the outside (it really looks beautiful outside.) And the furniture that was in the place in the photos isn’t the furniture that is here now. The previous tenants took their good stuff and the owners replaced it with stuff they had stored in their attic. Hard Futon-type sofa. No lamps except for one with no bulb and no shade. We live in candlelight-type dimness with only the bulbs in the old overhead lights. Let's not even talk about the inside of the closets and the exposed bathroom pipes with cruddy insulation foam squeezed in all the corners. Or the door handle in the second bedroom that is hanging off with no screws to put it back and tighten it. The washing machine that only has one cycle (at least it's cold water.) The mystery of what to do with the trash that never gets answered. That’s way more than “not quite up” to American standards.
Val #2: Well, you had a choice. Either put up with it, paying more attention to her feelings than yours or speak your mind. You chose to confront the issue because of how you felt. Richard would never have confronted her. Not his style. English and Irish folk are much more plain speaking than Americans are. Besides, she said two weeks ago when you did tell her that you two weren’t comfortable in the house that you should look for something else and she would have no trouble renting it. And she was fine last week when you texted her and said that you had found something and were moving. Why are you still carrying this?
Val #1: Because she hasn’t had any contact with us since then—she didn’t invite us over for the promised New Year’s celebrations.
Val #2: And this is a problem. . .why? In a week and a half you will never see her again and she’s highly unlikely to go on Facebook and slag you.
Val #1: Oh, go on Facebook and slag me!! I never thought of that!
Val #2: Oh good grief!

Obviously, Val #2 is much more pragmatic than Val #1. I think that Val #2 would like to just “be” if Val #1 would stop bugging her.



Time for bed methinks. But let's end with something upbeat--like how wonderful Simon & Garfunkel still sound after 50-odd years.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

January 2024 and blogging

  I haven't posted on my blog for a long time. Partly that was due to not knowing what to write about and partly it was wondering if I wanted to put myself "out there" anymore. And in what way. I subscribe to a few blogs on Substack, which is a subscription-based blog. You can pay to have your own blog, you can pay for someone else's blog, and that means you get to write and post and get comments back from a whole lot of people. You can comment on other people's blogs--if you pay--or else you can just read the blog and not pay. Of course you might miss some of the "pay only" content--much like modern news media has teaser stuff but to read the whole article, you have to pay for a subscription. The Substack blogs cover all kinds of topics and there are a few "professional" writers--meaning they're journalists and writers who have published and been paid larger bucks than the $5 a month they get per subscription on Substack--but I think most ...

Sunday in Richmond Park & Memories

  One of the reasons I came back to London after Ireland was to keep a date with my cousin Elizabeth: a Sunday morning walk in Richmond Park. When I moved to England in May of 1978, I rented a room in a house near Richmond Park. I'd heard of the room through a colleague at McGill University's Human Resources Department, where I was working as a Senior Clerk. Montreal had become a bit difficult for me to be in owing to a twice-broken heart and a feeling I wasn't going anywhere at McGill. It seemed like an omen, then, on the plane returning from South Africa in January of 1978--I keep promising to write about that--that I came across an article in a magazine about young Canadians living in London. I'd always loved the idea of being in London what with growing up on a diet of British movies and then all of the articles about Swinging London in the 1960s/early 1970s.  By the time I arrived at Mirabel Airport, I had the perfect antidote to my wounded pride over South...

Life on board the Queen Mary

Passenger's log on the Queen Mary 2: Dec 9th - First Day at Sea Didn't sleep well--think it was the soused mackerel at dinner. Anyway, R and I woke up at about 6:00 am and discussed the order of the day. Quite the swell outside and I can feel the roll of the ship. (No seasickness thank goodness!) Despite the mackerel, I was hungry so we went to King's Court at 6:30 a.m. Buffet with loads of choice of course. We sat in an alcove looking out at the ocean. Our server was from Croatia, Slavan. I asked him my burning question of the day--why did we get a free bottle of wine but a regular bottle of Diet Coke cost $3.75? Diet Pepsi is $1.00 less. Fruit juices are free on tap. Coffee, tea, milk, ditto. But you have to pay for soft drinks. Very odd. Slavan says it is because Cunard can't get a good contract with Coke. Hmmm.... our local School District back in Sierra Vista can negotiate .50 a can for the soda machines in the teachers' lounges but Cunard has to cha...